The most interesting thing in conservative politics right now is not the government shutdown and Donald Trump’s flailing attempt to claim victory while being defeated on all fronts. Instead it’s an ideological battle over Tucker Carlson’s recent Fox News soliloquy, in which he accused his fellow Republicans of building an anti-family, finance-dominated economic system that might be “the enemy of a healthy society.”
Carlson’s monologue was an expansion of themes that have dominated his reinvention as a Trump-era populist — the general folly of elites, the unwisdom of the bipartisan consensus on immigration and foreign policy, the failure of Republican leaders to defend the national interest.
But in expanding on those themes he went somewhere that Fox hosts rarely go — from culture into economics, from a critique of liberal cosmopolitanism into a critique of libertarianism, from a lament for the decline of the family to an argument that this decline can be laid at the feet of consumer capitalism as well as social liberalism.
[Listen to “The Argument” podcast every Thursday morning, with Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg and David Leonhardt.]
Just about every conservative worth reading was provoked into responding. One set of responses accused Carlson of a kind of conspiratorial socialism, which exaggerates economic misery, ignores capitalism’s fruits, and encourages ordinary people to blame shadowy elites instead of cultivating personal responsibility.
The other group basically said, no, Tucker has a point — the point being that market economies are inevitably shaped by public policy, that policies championed by both parties have failed to promote the interests of the working class, and that social conservatives especially need a framework of political economy to promote the institutions — family, work, neighborhood — upon which civil society depends.
If there is to be a healthy American right, after Donald Trump or ever, this is the argument that conservatives should be having. And it is especially an argument that Fox News should be highlighting, since Fox is frequently responsible for stoking populism but keeping it vacuous or racialized, evading the debates the right really needs.
Now let me attempt my own quick contribution. A key issue in the Carlson contretemps is distilled in this line from David French of National Review, one of the monologue’s critics: “There are wounds that public policy can’t heal.”
This is a crucial conservative insight, a caution for policymakers everywhere — but it can also become a trap, a cul-de-sac, an excuse for doing nothing. And that has happened too often for conservatives in recent decades: They’ve leaped to despair without even trying policy.
Let me give three examples. Modern conservatism was forged in the crucible of the 1970s inflation crisis, and in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crash many conservatives were convinced that there was nothing the Federal Reserve could do about the vast army of the unemployed without touching off a similar inflationary spiral.
But in hindsight this was wrong, the feared inflation never came, and the economic recovery was slowed because of the Republican fixation on tight money. Of course, in the Trump era some Republicans have conveniently become dovish on inflation. But in the preceding eight years, wage-earning Americans suffered unnecessarily because of a wrongheaded right-wing counsel of despair.
A second example: While it’s true that family breakdown has deep and tangled roots, it’s also true that in the 1940s and 1950s, a mix of government policy, union strength and conservative gender norms established a “family wage” — an income level that enabled a single breadwinner to support a family.
Maybe it isn’t possible to recreate a family wage for a less unionized and more feminist age — but are we sure? Is there really nothing conservatives can do to address the costs of child care, the unfulfilled parental desire to shift to part-time work, the problem that a slightly more reactionary iteration of Elizabeth Warren once dubbed “the two-income trap”? If marriages and intact families and birthrates declined as the family wage crumbled, perhaps we should try rebuilding that economic foundation before we declare the crisis of the family a wound that policy can’t heal.
A final example: Historically conservatism has been proudly paternalist, favorable to forms of censorship and prohibition for the sake of protecting precisely the private virtues that Carlson’s critics think government can’t cultivate. But in recent decades, the right’s elites have despaired of censoring pornography, acquiesced to the spread of casino gambling, made peace with the creeping commercialization of marijuana, and accepted the internet’s conquest of childhood and adolescence.
Yet none of these trends actually seem entirely beyond the influence of regulation. It’s just that conservatism has given up — once again, in unwarranted despair — on earlier assumptions about how public paternalism can encourage private virtue.
The deeper point here is that public policy is rarely a cure-all, but it can often be a corrective. And the part of Carlson’s monologue his critics should especially ponder is the end, when he suggests that absent a corrective that "protects normal families," even the normal will eventually turn to socialism — choosing a left-wing overcorrection over a right that just says, Well, you see, we already cut corporate taxes, so there's nothing we can do.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTOpinion) and Instagram, join the Facebook political discussion group, Voting While Female.B:
2019六合公开大全【各】【位】【读】【者】【朋】【友】，【由】【于】【本】【书】【设】【定】【有】【些】【问】【题】，【所】【以】【暂】【停】【更】【新】，【新】【书】《【我】【有】【一】【座】【南】【天】【门】》【已】【经】【发】【布】，【喜】【欢】【看】【玄】【幻】【小】【说】【的】【兄】【弟】【们】【可】【以】【订】【阅】【一】【下】。 【这】【回】【确】【定】【是】【单】【主】【角】，【目】【前】【南】【天】【门】【已】【经】【存】【了】【二】【十】【万】【字】，【不】【会】【断】【更】，【各】【位】【可】【以】【放】【心】【收】【藏】。 【至】【于】《【一】【剑】【动】【神】【州】》【等】【我】【出】【名】【以】【后】，【会】【推】【翻】【重】【写】【的】。 【谢】【谢】【大】【家】【支】【持】。 【在】【这】【里】
【此】【刻】【的】【许】【小】【雅】【恨】【不】【得】【马】【上】【就】【去】【找】【总】【编】【理】【论】，【说】【好】【的】【不】【带】【家】【属】，【她】【田】【七】【葵】【这】【样】【高】【调】【的】【出】【现】，【算】【什】【么】【意】【思】？ 【然】【而】【还】【没】【等】【许】【小】【雅】【发】【作】，【于】【梦】【梦】【似】【乎】【发】【现】【了】【倪】【秋】【轩】【用】【余】【光】【瞪】【了】【自】【己】【一】【眼】，【便】【又】【从】【善】【如】【流】【的】【解】【释】【道】，“【不】【过】，【也】【可】【能】【只】【是】【送】【七】【葵】【过】【来】【的】，【不】【一】【定】【和】【我】【们】【一】【起】【去】【团】【建】。” 【许】【小】【雅】【听】【到】【这】【句】【话】，【愤】【怒】【的】【心】【情】【却】【丝】
【但】【出】【于】【对】【暮】【云】【卿】【的】【绝】【对】【信】【任】【纵】【然】【是】【疑】【惑】【水】【窗】【黎】【手】【里】【奏】【琴】【的】【动】【作】【依】【旧】【是】【紧】【跟】【暮】【云】【卿】【的】【步】【伐】，【知】【道】【弹】【至】【第】【二】【琴】【曲】【时】【水】【窗】【黎】【才】【算】【彻】【底】【明】【白】【暮】【云】【卿】【究】【竟】【想】【做】【什】【么】，【阵】【法】【融】【合】。 【暮】【云】【卿】【所】【奏】【第】【二】【部】【分】【琴】【曲】【乃】【是】《【焚】【天】》，【琴】【曲】《【焚】【天】》【乃】【是】【凶】【杀】【阵】【之】【首】，【杀】【伤】【力】【十】【足】，【也】【是】【目】【前】【为】【止】【暮】【云】【卿】【练】【的】【最】【好】【的】【一】【个】【阵】【法】。 【在】【最】【先】【学】
“【唔】，【希】【望】【我】【下】【来】【啊】……【既】【然】【如】【此】，【那】【就】【没】【办】【法】【了】。” 【莎】【莎】【乖】【乖】【下】【来】，【坐】【在】【叶】【丞】【隔】【壁】【的】【位】【子】【上】。 【接】【着】【出】【声】：“【唔】……” 【她】【一】【副】【百】【思】【不】【解】【的】【样】【子】【思】【索】【着】。 【夏】【依】【似】【乎】【松】【了】【口】【气】，【这】【点】【让】【叶】【丞】【略】【带】【罪】【恶】【感】。 【从】【一】【旁】【传】【来】【莎】【莎】【念】【念】【有】【词】【着】“【是】【什】【么】【不】【对】【呢】……【是】【嫌】【重】【吗】”【的】【声】【音】。【接】【下】【来】【这】【回】【她】【点】【头】“【嗯】”2019六合公开大全【夜】【空】【中】，【一】【轮】【圆】【月】，【给】【夜】【色】【涂】【抹】【一】【层】【淡】【淡】【的】【韵】【律】。【没】【有】【预】【约】【的】【精】【灵】，【不】【经】【意】【间】【叩】【动】【了】【善】【感】【的】【灵】【魂】。【一】【个】【人】，【守】【着】【如】【银】【的】【月】【光】，【独】【自】【醉】，【忘】【记】【所】【有】。 【一】【抹】【牵】【念】，【越】【过】【时】【间】【越】【过】【千】【山】【万】【水】【越】【过】【人】【间】【冷】【暖】【越】【过】【江】【南】【雨】【巷】【静】【静】【停】【留】【在】【塞】【外】【荒】【漠】【那】【人】【生】【初】【见】【的】【美】【丽】【中】。【一】【把】【油】【纸】【伞】【遮】【住】【翘】【首】【期】【盼】【的】【深】【眸】【一】【滴】【绵】【绵】【细】【雨】【打】【湿】【睫】【上】【尘】
【江】【鱼】【一】【怔】，【摇】【了】【摇】【头】。 【莫】【三】【娘】【瞅】【瞅】【左】【右】，【压】【低】【声】【音】【道】：“【独】【孤】【平】【曾】【经】【是】【韩】【飞】【的】【师】【傅】，【携】【带】【韩】【飞】【千】【里】【同】【行】，【远】【赴】【塞】【外】，【送】【他】【去】【天】【山】【灵】【鹫】【宫】【学】【艺】。” 【江】【鱼】【心】【头】【一】【震】，【低】【声】【道】：“【你】【说】【他】【是】【为】【了】【飞】【儿】【出】【头】？” 【莫】【三】【娘】【缓】【缓】【点】【头】，【低】【声】【道】：“【韩】【飞】【争】【位】【失】【败】，【独】【孤】【平】【心】【中】【不】【忿】，【找】【你】【为】【难】，【就】【是】【为】【了】【替】【韩】【飞】【出】【头】。”
【高】【台】【上】【的】【黄】【金】【可】【汗】【面】【色】【大】【变】。 “【鲲】【鹏】！【太】【古】【鲲】【施】【展】【上】【古】【妖】【身】【了】！” 【上】【古】【鲲】【鹏】【的】【厉】【害】，【众】【人】【都】【是】【晓】【得】。 【那】【是】【体】【魄】【比】【天】【大】，【一】【念】【便】【可】【吞】【噬】【掉】【一】【座】【大】【陆】【的】【怪】【物】。【正】【是】【因】【为】【拥】【有】【着】【鲲】【鹏】【的】【血】【脉】，【才】【使】【得】【太】【古】【鲲】【在】【整】【个】【圣】【山】【有】【着】【如】【此】【高】【的】【地】【位】。【以】【往】【众】【人】【只】【是】【忌】【惮】【他】【于】【他】【体】【内】【的】【血】【脉】，【而】【此】【刻】，【随】【着】【太】【古】【鲲】【晋】【升】【到】【沧】【海】
“【怎】【么】【办】？【卡】【塔】【库】【栗】，【连】【妈】【妈】【都】【败】【了】，【我】【们】【不】【可】【能】【是】【这】【怪】【物】【的】【对】【手】。”【卡】【塔】【库】【栗】【身】【边】【的】【欧】【文】【说】【道】。 “【撤】【退】……”【卡】【塔】【库】【栗】【立】【刻】【说】【道】。 “【现】【在】【能】【跑】【吗】？”【旁】【边】【的】【斯】【慕】【吉】【也】【退】【到】【了】【卡】【塔】【库】【栗】【的】【身】【边】【说】【道】。 “【布】【蕾】【呢】？”【卡】【塔】【库】【栗】【问】【道】。 “【在】【这】【里】，【昏】【过】【去】【了】。”【旁】【边】【的】【巴】【巴】【路】【亚】【拉】【过】【来】【一】【个】【人】，【正】【是】【之】【前】【被】
【余】【庆】【阳】【听】【说】【这】【件】【事】，【已】【经】【是】【一】【个】【月】【之】【后】【了】。 【还】【是】【从】【外】【人】【的】【口】【中】【听】【说】【的】。 【一】【个】【酒】【局】【上】，【另】【外】【一】【个】【公】【司】【的】【老】【总】，【以】【开】【玩】【笑】【的】【口】【吻】【对】【他】【说】，【你】【们】【公】【司】【有】【个】【人】【因】【为】【老】【婆】【跟】【人】【家】【跑】【了】，【借】【酒】【消】【愁】，【喝】【多】【后】【跳】【了】【楼】，【人】【没】【死】，【结】【果】【把】【腰】【给】【摔】【断】【了】。 【第】【二】【天】，【余】【庆】【阳】【把】【陈】【永】【发】【叫】【到】【办】【公】【室】，“【你】【们】【公】【司】【有】【人】【跳】【楼】？” “